Skip to main content

How to Handle Cost Share and Match Without Regret

Match is a promise you can be held to. Learn the difference between required and voluntary cost share, what counts, and how to document it before you commit.

A match requirement looks like a line in the notice and turns into a commitment you have to prove two years later. Organizations get into trouble when they promise more than they can document, count things the rules don't allow or discover at reporting time that the volunteer hours were never recorded.

This article explains how federal cost sharing works, the difference between required and voluntary cost share, what can count and how it's valued, and how to decide how much to commit. By the end you'll be able to list what your organization can really document before it promises anything.

What cost share and match mean

Under 2 CFR 200.1, cost sharing is the portion of project costs not paid by federal funds. Matching is the subset of that: a required level of cost share that you must provide. The two terms get used loosely, but the distinction matters for what you're obligated to do.

Cost share generally falls into two groups:

  • Required. The notice says you must contribute a set amount or percentage. Appendix I to 2 CFR 200 tells agencies to state clearly whether cost sharing is required and that not committing to it makes the application ineligible. The notice should also explain how the requirement is calculated and any limits on the types of contribution that count.
  • Voluntary committed. Nothing requires it, but you pledge it in your proposal budget. The definition in 2 CFR 200.1 is blunt: voluntary committed cost sharing becomes a binding requirement of the federal award.

That second point is the one that catches people. If you put extra match in the budget to look stronger, you may be held to it, even though the funder never asked.

Read how the notice treats it

Federal agencies are discouraged from using voluntary committed cost sharing as a factor in merit review. 2 CFR 200.306(a) says it isn't expected under federal research grants, and that when an agency does use it for other programs, the notice must specify how it will be considered. Appendix I adds that the notice should say whether cost sharing counts toward points, breaks ties or isn't part of the evaluation at all.

So before you commit, find three answers in the notice:

  1. Is cost share required, and how is it calculated?
  2. What types of contribution are allowed?
  3. Does offering more earn anything in review?

Some notices define a match as a percentage of total project cost, while others use a percentage of the federal request. The same "20 percent" produces different numbers. Do the arithmetic both ways if the wording isn't clear, and ask the program contact. If the match turns out to be heavier than your organization can carry, that is a legitimate reason to decide not to apply. The go or no-go questions include it.

What can count

2 CFR 200.306(b) lists the conditions. Cost share, whether cash or third-party in-kind contributions, is accepted when it:

  • Is verifiable in your records.
  • Isn't counted toward any other federal award.
  • Is necessary and reasonable for achieving the award's objectives.
  • Is allowable under the cost principles.
  • Isn't paid by the federal government under another award, unless the program's statute says otherwise.
  • Is provided for in the approved budget when the agency requires it.

Cash is the simplest: money from your unrestricted funds, a local government, a foundation or another non-federal source, set aside for the project.

In-kind contributions are donated goods and services, and they need more work to value:

  • Volunteer services from professional and technical personnel, consultants and other labor can count if the service is necessary for the program. Rates must be consistent with what you pay for similar work, or, where you don't have the skill in-house, with what the local labor market pays.
  • Donated property such as supplies or equipment is valued at no more than fair market value at the time of donation.
  • Donated space can't be valued above the fair rental value of comparable space, established by an independent appraisal of comparable space in a privately owned building in the same locality.
  • Unrecovered indirect costs can count only with the prior approval of the federal agency or pass-through entity.

Fair market value of third-party in-kind contributions must be documented and, where feasible, supported by the same methods you use internally.

A hypothetical worked example

Say a rural health clinic is applying for a federal grant. It requests $150,000, and the notice defines the required match as 20 percent of total project cost. Total project cost is therefore $150,000 ÷ 0.80 = $187,500, and the match is $37,500.

SourceHow it's valuedAmount
Cash from unrestricted fundsBoard-approved allocation$15,000
Volunteer nurse hours300 hours × $42 an hour, the rate the clinic pays for comparable work$12,600
Donated meeting space12 months × $825, supported by an independent appraisal of comparable local space$9,900
Total match$37,500

Three things make this defensible. The cash is committed in writing, the volunteer rate matches what the clinic pays comparable staff and the space value rests on an appraisal. Each row comes with a record someone can hand an auditor.

Document it as you go

Match is easy to promise and hard to prove after the fact. Set up the records before the award starts:

  • Letters of commitment from each outside source that is giving cash or goods, stating the amount and what it's for. The notice may require them with the application. See MOUs and letters of commitment.
  • Timesheets or logs for volunteers, with dates, hours and tasks, signed.
  • Valuation notes showing how you set each rate or fair market value.
  • A match ledger that tracks pledged against actually documented amounts, reviewed with your finance lead each quarter.

Federal award records, including these, must be kept for three years from the date you submit the final financial report, under 2 CFR 200.334, and longer if there is an audit, claim or litigation. Your award terms may add reporting detail.

Don't over-commit

More match isn't always more points, and it's never free of risk. If the notice doesn't score it, an extra pledge only adds a promise you can fail to keep. If you can't meet a binding commitment, you'll be explaining the gap to your grants officer.

A sound rule is to commit only what you could document today. Count what's secured, not what you hope will arrive. If the required amount is above that number, find out before you apply whether a partner, a local funder or a donated asset can close the gap.

Your next step

This week, list the match your organization could actually document today. For each item, write the amount, the source, the evidence you'd hand an auditor and the person responsible for tracking it. Compare the total against the next match requirement you're considering. If you're not sure how a contribution should be valued or whether it's allowable, ask your grants officer or auditor before you promise it. The budget justification is the place to show the number once it holds up.

Since a requirement like this often sits in a notice's fine print, SoliContraX starts from the notice you upload and gets you to a finished draft, checked against what the funder asked for. Deciding what to commit is still your call. Start your next application.

Sources

All posts

How to Handle Cost Share and Match Without Regret · SoliContraX